Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Talking Turkey—About Zombies

Since Thanksgiving week is all about eating, naturally my thoughts turn to zombies.

I mean, they live to eat. Even though they don’t, technically speaking, well, live. And even though it makes no sense that they’re ravenous for human flesh, because why would a corpse have an appetite?

I was thinking about all this last Sunday night when I was watching The Walking Dead on TV. In case you don’t know, this is weekly series that’s broadcast on AMC. Which, extending the theme of counter-intuition, stands for American Movie Classics. The Walking Dead is neither a movie nor a classic. Rather, it’s an episodic television show, based on a series of graphic novels (hifalutin’ comic books) about a small band of survivors of an unexplained (in the show, at least) apocalypse that has killed most of the world’s population, littering the landscape with corpses. Many of whom (but not all, somehow) have reanimated—in the sense that they can move, see, hear and smell, if not breathe, enunciate beyond hisses and moans, or mitigate the stench of their steady decomposition. Furthermore, these “walkers,” when not eating survivors wholesale, lethally infect them with bites that turn them into zombies, too.

None of it frankly makes any sense, even within its own little suspension-of-disbelief universe. Which tends to makes the plots head-scratchingly stupid. Not only that, but the show’s writing, character development and acting are pedestrian at best (pun sort of intended). That’s why I write that, in addition to not being a movie, The Walking Dead isn’t a classic by any stretch. It’s in only its second season, so there’s time for it to become one, I suppose. If, that is, it somehow can fashion its own framework of absurdist logic and hire new writers and actors to implement it.

So, why do I watch this program? It’s stupid, yes, but it’s stupid fun. The makeup, prosthetics, etc, are excellent, and the zombies are genuinely frightening. (An aside: How did “zombie” come to be synonymous with the undead dead, when the term used to be applied to a living person reduced by voodoo to a trance-like state?) The show, thus, is suspenseful, and sometimes delightfully nerve-wracking.

Also, much as watching The Biggest Loser makes me feel good about my ability to exit my house and car without the aid of a crowbar or the fire department, watching The Walking Dead makes living in our real world of environmental, economic, political and civil collapse feel at least slightly more tolerable. I mean, don’t get me wrong—I’m as disgusted as you are that our congressional “supercommittee” promised steely resolve, then crumbled like tinfoil. And yes, it’s hard not to feel that all may be lost when Americans are so desperate for leadership that Newt Gingrich can rise to the top of the GOP presidential field simply because he has ideas—however wrongheaded and disproven and egocentric those ideas might be. Still, just as Tom Waits once famously sang that he’d rather have “a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy,” so, too, would I—speaking of brains—rather not have mine ripped from my cranium and gobbled up by ghouls. As depressing as real life can be, come The Walking Dead’s conclusion at 10 pm Sunday nights, I feel grateful that I’ll soon be sleeping in a comfortable bed, beside a spouse who may punch me to stop snoring but at least is unlikely to cannibalize me.

So, anyway, getting back to eating. Last week’s episode of The Walking Dead included a scene in which a woman standing in a hayloft emptied a sack of live chickens onto a barn floor, where a group of walkers were lurching and hissing and moaning, as the undead dead are wont to do. Please don’t ask why a bunch of zombies were being held captive, rather than having been dispatched by the standard methods—a bullet to the brain or beheading. Again, none of it makes any sense, even within its own crazy context. How is it that something that’s already dead can be killed, anyway? If I told you that these particular zombies are being protected by a flipped-out retired veterinarian who thinks they’re only “sick,” and that they shouldn’t be stigmatized simply because they’re rancid killing machines, would that help sort things out? I didn’t think so.

Moving on. The woman, a daughter of the nutty veterinarian, emptied her sack of chickens and the zombies below—who happened to include the Corpse Formerly Known as Mom—went into a feeding frenzy. Again, why do the dead need to eat at all? If they like chickens so much, shouldn’t survivors tote a supply of Rhode Island Reds at all times to buy themselves getaway time whenever the zombies get close? I read on a Web site somewhere—naturally, there now are more Web sites and chats devoted to The Walking Dead than those dedicated to sustainable agriculture and nuclear disarmament—that the walkers will eat only live animals. Now, why is that?! Is it because the show would be much less horrific if survivors could simply leave a freshly-baked pie on the window sill for a passing zombie to conveniently “steal,” leaving the humans alone? Are walkers ever satiated, anyway? Were they to feast on us at the Thanksgiving table tomorrow, might they later in the day go into a tryptophan coma and doze to the sound of football on TV? While that seems unlikely, it would make about as much sense as anything else in the zombie universe.

I suppose that, in a certain sense, zombies are eating my brain, because I spend a lot of time puzzling over supernatural inconsistencies and illogic that could be better expended on any number of other things. But at least I’m not the only one wasting brainpower in this way. Per my earlier mention of Web sites, there are hundreds, probably thousands, of people who labor over this nonsense at far greater length than do I. I recently picked up a copy of the Washington City Paper to find the syndicated “Straight Dope” column, which is written by Cecil Adams, the self-proclaimed “world’s most intelligent human.” The question posed by a reader was this: “Putting aside the brain-eating and all that, how dangerous is the combined smell of all those ambulatory corpses? I assume they’re giving off methane or ammonia or some other noxious gas. Would the aggregate stench of hundreds of walking dead make your mall sanctuary uninhabitable, even if you managed to keep from being bitten?”

OK, first, why “how dangerous is” the smell, as opposed to “how dangerous would it be”? Does this reader live in a town where creeping malodorousness suggests a looming ambulatory-corpse crisis? Second, while Cecil Adams at least is smart enough to get paid to answer zombie questions, is this really the smartest use of a stratospheric IQ that otherwise might be put to use identifying new energy sources, or perhaps a way to isolate and neutralize the gun-nut gene that daily makes me want to strangle my own country?

Adams’ answer, while circumstantially irrelevant, was based on science and made for fascinating reading. Did you know that “aptly named gasses cadaverine and putrescine are primarily responsible for dead-body smell”? Me, neither! (Actually, I probably did know it, when I read Mary Roach’s Stiff: The Curious Life of Cadavers, but I’d since forgotten.) To make a long response short, Adams concluded, “While the stench of zombies probably won’t kill you”—again, why “won’t” as opposed to “wouldn’t?” does Adams know something?—“it may gross you out of existence. If you’re somewhere that makes you constantly want to throw up, that to me is a good working definition of an uninhabitable environment.”

See, that’s the thing. The world in which we actually live no doubt makes every one of us want to vomit from time to time. One can reasonably argue, too, that—given global warming and its predictably dire consequences—Earth is becoming less habitable with each passing year. For now, though, our immediate environments—climatic and personal—remain (at least for those of us with jobs) within the comfort zone.

Put another way, if we aren’t able to keep our food down tomorrow, it will be because we overstuffed our guts, not because a shuffling army of zombies are harshing our mellow and stinkin’ up the joint.

That being the case, allow me to wish you and yours a very Happy Thanksgiving. And bon appétit.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Return of the Bird

News a couple of weeks ago that the Baltimore Orioles will feature the goofy, grinning cartoon-bird logo on team caps next season for the first time since 1988 made me grin just as goofily. It’s a feel-good image in and of itself, but more than that, it hearkens back to the days when the following the Orioles was fun.

The cartoon bird reminds me of the great teams of the 1970s, when future hall of famers Brooks Robinson, Jim Palmer and Frank Robinson were being profanely pushed to the limits of their talent by Manager Earl Weaver, himself later enshrined in Cooperstown. It brings back images of Memorial Stadium rocking to cheers led by bearded, beer-gutted cab driver Wild Bill Hagy.

Which obviously is why the team brass has dusted off the cartoon bird, supplanting the “ornithologically correct” bird associated with the reality of 14 straight seasons of losing under the bungling yet defiant ownership of Peter Angelos. Team ownership won’t change in 2012, but perhaps the Orioles’ fortunes somehow will, the cartoon bird’s reappearance is meant to suggest. Anyway, how’s about turning that frown upside down and joining the impish bird in a break from all your worries? Why not simply crack open a cold one, sit back and enjoy the game, whether you’re watching at Oriole Park at Camden Yards or at home on your TV?

Presumably this was a marketing decision many months in the making. It probably had nothing to do with the suicide of Mike Flanagan this past August. But for me, there’s a connection that’s more sweet than bitter.

Flanagan was a mainstay of the Orioles pitching staff in late 1970s and early 1980s. He won the American League’s Cy Young Award as its most outstanding hurler in 1979, a year in which his team came within one victory of winning the World Series. In a 17-year major league career spent primarily with Baltimore, he won 167 games. He threw the last pitch by the home team at Memorial Stadium in fall 1991, then retired the following year.

Flanagan served as the Orioles’ pitching coach for two seasons in the 1990s, as the team’s executive vice president for baseball operations from 2006 to 2008, and as an Orioles broadcaster for many of the years in between. He broadcast games until late August of this year, in fact. When, on his property in the Baltimore suburbs, he put a gun to his head and pulled the trigger, thereby ending his long career with the team and his 59-year association with the planet.

Why did he do it? Reports conflicted. Money woes apparently were a factor. But some sources suggested he also was despondent about the franchise’s long slide from relevance, and perceptions in some quarters that he’d been part of the problem. It’s hard to imagine where Flanagan got that, since, for most Orioles fans, the blame begins and ends with Angelos. It’s difficult to imagine an unkind word having been uttered about Flanagan, an earnest, hard-working, wry New Englander who always stood out as an island of competence in a sea of miscalculation and outright haplessness.

The suicide shocked most everyone, even people who’d known him well. Not so much his wife, who vaguely alluded to demons of long standing. Who knows what goes on in the mind of a man whose pain is so deep, whose perceptions are so warped, that he thinks self-negation is the only way out?

But let’s say money was part of it, and losing another part. And let’s assume that, like pretty much every other middle-aged man, Flanagan mourned, to at least some degree, the loss of youth. Let’s go out on a limb and speculate that he felt his best days were long past. It isn’t hard for me to imagine that, until the very moment his long-shrinking Happy Place vanished entirely, that portal in his mind opened out onto a long-gone ballfield located several miles from the Inner Harbor, where Flanagan was still a pitcher in his prime, in tip-top shape statistically, physically and on the balance sheet. Where his team won far more often than it lost. Where the hats were goofy but the baseball wasn’t.

Mike Flanagan won’t be back at Camden Yards next spring. But his talisman, his ornithologically incorrect little buddy, will be. And that somehow makes me smile. The cartoon bird won’t make a lick of difference in the standings, of course. If the team improves at all, real-life ballplayers will make that happen, not some animated mascot. But the bird’s reappearance will make a difference to me. It will feel much more like a tribute to Flanagan than did the memorial patches the players wore on their uniforms in September. It will feel like a breezy reminder of a happier time.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

The Week That Was

It’s been quite an eventful past week in the news. So, for what it’s worth—and remember, when you read a blog that’s free, you get what you pay for—these are my quick takes on some of the major and not-so-major stories of the past several days.

Students riot in State College, Pennsylvania, in wake of Joe Paterno firing. Sure, it’s outrageous that anyone should defend Joe Pa’s complete lack of moral accountability in the child sex-abuse scandal surrounding his one-time aide, let alone that Paterno’s defenders should resort to violence and vandalism. On the other hand, though, the disgraced octogenerian probably can expect a commendation from The Vatican for his indifference, and complimentary membership in the American Man-Boy Love Society. (As I understand it, the latter includes monthly issues of society’s provocative periodical, Standing Behind Youth.)

Sexual harassment accusations mount against GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain. With his poll numbers slipping, as both credible victim accounts and inconsistencies in Cain’s own version of events mount, the embattled candidate might want to rethink his planned ace-in-the-hole defense: Inviting former DC mayor and current city councilman Marion Barry to share with the news media his belief that “the bitches set Herman up.” (Cain also, frankly, probably shouldn’t characterize anything, at this point, as being “in the hole.” I’m just sayin’.)

Race tightens for GOP presidential nod. Speaking of Herman Cain, in the latest nationwide poll of Republican primary voters, the embattled candidate nevertheless continued narrowly to lead the party’s presidential field—with a jaw-dropping 61% of respondents saying Cain’s alleged behavior toward women mattered not at all to them. In what may be a related development, left-for-dead blowhard Newt Gingrich, who was Speaker of the US House of Representatives sometime in the 19th century, now is tied for second place among GOP primary voters. Time was when Gingrich’s hypocrisy as a cheating-spouse Family Values candidate was held against him by the party faithful, but it seems that the power of Cain’s appeal to overwhelmingly white Republican voters as a conservative, unthreatening black man has opened the floodgates of GOP compassion for misogynists. Gingrich’s rise also appears to be the latest indication that Republican True Believers would rather concede the election to President Obama than hand the nomination to Mitt Romney. I might not even rule out a “Draft Paterno” movement.

Mississippi voters reject ballot measure to define a fertilized egg as a person. This one honestly shocked me—in a good way. Whenever I catch wind of an insane ballot item anywhere in the Bible Belt—whether its aim is to name Jesus Christ the official State Savior, or to mandate the bludgeoning of anyone with a Darwin symbol on his or her car, or to hereby resolve that “The War of Northern Aggression was never about slavery, but anyway, what exactly was so bad about an institution that boosted the economy and spawned some outstanding spirituals?”—I always assume the witless initiative is going to pass. But one news account I read suggested that the Mississippi measure was defeated because its language went too far—it also would have had “far-reaching impacts on birth control, in vitro fertilization, and a doctor’s ability to provide care for pregnant women.” Still, I fully expect proponents to tweak the language and give it another go at some point. Perhaps next time they’ll employ a non-threatening mascot to broaden the entreaty’s appeal. I just can picture it: The joyous, accordion-wielding Zygote Zydeco, back by his rockin’ Cajun band, the Moments of Conception.

Bil Keane, creator of The Family Circus, dies at 89. While I’ve always found Keane’s single-panel God-and-family comic, now drawn by his son Jeff, to be saccharine and insipid, it has spawned some great parodies by other cartoonists. Which Keane, to his credit, always seemed to take in stride. I also was amused—in a way I never was by the cartoon itself—by this anecdote that turned up in Keane’s obituary Wednesday in the Washington Post:

In 1984, Mr. Keane told the Post about how he decided to add a new character to The Family Circus by introducing a baby into his cartoon family.

“My wife was outside the studio working in the garden,” he recalled. “I ran out of the studio and said, ‘Thel, what would you think of adding a new baby to the family?’ She said, ‘Well, it’s all right, but let me finish the weeding first.’ ”

Ha! That’s good stuff. Maybe Thelma should’ve written the comic.

Duggars announce they’re expecting—again. Speaking of babies, in an appearance on The Today Show, Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar, the prolific procreators who birthed the TLC reality TV show originally named 17 Kids and Counting, announced that we can count on little Duggar number 20, currently in Michelle’s delivery system. My first thought was, “Man, the pressure really is on Octomom now!” No, my real first thought was that unless Jim Bob, a former Arkansas state legislator, is planning to reenter politics and cruise to victory on family votes alone, these people are insane. Also, were I Michelle’s uterus (don’t dwell on that image), I would sue for reckless endangerment. Why are people who go out of their way to deplete the Earth’s limited resources rewarded for their efforts with a TV show and constant publicity? Speaking of which, I’m wondering when Hotpoint will dangle a promotional deal for a series of “buns in the oven” ads.

Berlusconi exit makes it official: These are tough times for playboys. First, porn magnate and fossilized hedonist Hugh Hefner earlier this year was jilted on wedding’s eve by his nubile fiancée, in a triumph of revulsion over commerce. Then, actor George Clooney’s much-younger ex-girlfriend, Italian actress Elisabetta Canalis, told the media a month or two ago that she had considered him more of a father figure than a boyfriend. This suggests on its face an alarming family dynamic in the Canalis household. But it couldn’t have heartened Clooney’s ladies-man ego to have the world know that when his sultry ex used to cuddle up on his lap, she merely was angling for a bedtime story. Finally, yesterday, 75-year-old Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi—he of reported palace orgies and a criminal investigation into his relationship with a 17-year-old girl—was forced from office by an economic mess that’s disastrous even by Italian standards. According to an account in this morning’s Washington Post, “Crowds of demonstrators erupted in a joyous yell and waved Italian flags as news spread of Berlusconi’s resignation. One group sang choruses of ‘Hallelujah’ to celebrate his departure.’” To a man who likely has paid legions of prostitutes to sing that exact same chorus at a certain key moment, it must have been a sadly humiliating scene.