I always was torn
between the desire to give them a wide berth because they might be dangerously
unstable and the temptation to draw closer to them because the conversation
figured to be interesting, if bizarre. God or Jesus often was invoked (or
channeled). But also oft-times represented, somewhat counterintuitively, were motherfuckers.
The latter might well be emissaries of the government, or of quasi-governmental
cabals who were conspiring to command our minds through radio-controlled
squirrels, or perhaps to kill us all by mixing lead into the fluoride in our
water.
Nowadays, of
course, it’s impossible to get that sort of heads-up on the mentally unbalanced
because everyone is talking to him- or herself on public streets. Well, not
technically, but it can seem so to the ears of the overhearing listener. This
is because everyone is on their damn phone, all the time—often via a headphone
device, such that there isn’t even the visual giveaway of a cell phone cupped
to the speaker’s ear.
These conversations
never are interesting. They are to mundane banality as the deinstitutionalized
motor-mouths’ monologues of old were to disturbing calliope. Let’s face it:
“What’s up?” or “I’m at Safeway,” or “Jen’s boyfriend was so, like, drunk!”
pales in comparison with shouted, profanity-laced biblical verses. I find
myself wanting to give the cell-talkers a wide berth not because I worry about
being jabbed with a sharp object or pummeled by a concealed hammer, but because
I find their end of the conversation so boring and annoying and intrusive. I
long for the days of phone booths, when people quite literally took it inside.
But there simply is no giving the cell-talkers a wide berth, because they are
everywhere. Skirt one of them and you just pull within range of another.
Actually, it’s not
true that everyone is talking on the phone all the time. What is true, though, is that everyone is
doing something on the phone all the
time—texting, or Googling, or deploying one of their million apps to route
their next run, or rate a restaurant, or see if there’s a CVS in the next
block. To most people, this is progress. This is convenience. This is saving
time that later can be spent doing these exact same things on their wired TV
set inside their house or apartment. But this hyper-connectivity drives me
crazy. Yes, crazy enough even to sometimes talk aloud to myself in public—although
I’m neither up on my biblical verses nor sufficiently paranoid to spin an
elaborate conspiracy theory. Crazy enough, though, to mutter under my breath
things like “Shut up!” or “What’s so fucking important?” or “Dear God, can’t
you just read the newspaper!”
I know, I know.
It’s been the 21st century for many years now, and as disorienting and
cacophonous as I find the death of my old world of turntables (or even CDs), road
atlases, film cameras and wistful reminiscence, and its replacement by a new
world in which nearly every moment is written about, remarked on, and
photographed—and in which mystery, accordingly, seems all but lost—I need, to
some extent, to get with the program. I do acknowledge this. I’ve been
defiantly cell phone-less—let alone smartphone equipped—to this point, but I
confess that being completely outside the technological loop hasn’t been fun.
It’s made me extremely cranky (can you maybe tell?) and has deepened my innate
fear that I’m at root stupid and incapable of understanding, let alone adapting
to, modern technology. Never mind that every day I see little kids flipping
among all those icons with their chubby fingers, tapping out texts, and
downloading songs from some site called iTunes. The fact is, until I start trying to do some
of those things myself, I will worry that I’m intellectually incapable of doing
so. That’s part of my pathology, which predates this century and manifested itself in
other ways before it ever had supercharged phones on which to fixate.
So, I give up. I
give in. Rather, I concede to the need. Not the need to telephonically
communicate from wherever I might be, just because I can—as I don’t expect my
distaste for talking on the phone to change. Not the need to text constantly—as I
don’t have that much to say, frankly, and one-finger typing will be considerably
more laborious on a small screen. And not the need, either, to take a zillion
photographs of unremarkable images that needn’t be shared. But, rather, the
need to discontinue a self-segregation that in many ways ill-serves me. I can’t
imagine I’ll ever embrace the smartphone with anything approaching the zeal of most
people, but it will be convenient to be able to call Lynn if I’m running late.
It will be nice to be able to text or e-mail a friend if something I see reminds
me of him or her in a fun and affirming way. And, who knows, I might even,
someday, want to start building a musical library I can carry in my pocket.
That’s why,
sometime in the coming months, Lynn and I—after she’s done the research and
pricing and other due diligence for which she’s famous—each will get
smartphones. It will be a good thing, I think. It’s a necessary thing for me, I
know.
And this concession
will come none too soon, frankly, because the Next Big Thing, much in the news
of late, is Google Glass—technology-enhanced spectacles that are being
described as “augmented reality,” because God knows reality isn’t quite real
enough by itself. The other day, I Googled—appropriately enough—this soon-to-be
marketed product, and I found it described on the website techradar.com as “an
attempt to free data from desktop computers and portable devices like phones
and tablets, and place it right in front of your eyes.”
My feeling about this
is, it’s about time that data was freed from the shackles of our fingertips and
brought to eye level, saving humankind literally seconds that people now are
wasting looking down at their phones. And won’t it be great when folks can look
you directly in the eye without actually engaging you, because they’re reading
data on their specs or taking a picture of something behind you? Surely, too,
this will be a great boon to public safety—hardly distracting for drivers at
all. And in no way does it figure to be a privacy or civil liberties concern.
Ain’t technology grand!
In other words,
it’s best that I conquer smartphone loathing before I even have the chance to get
started on Google Glass contempt. Elsewise, I’m liable to lose it and
become one of those old-school ranters, asking and answering my own crazy
questions in the middle of the public square.