It’s Groundhog Day. Is it
ever.
I’m not talking about the
ritual of scaring a poor woodchuck half to death in service to a bogus weather
forecast. I’m referencing the Bill Murray movie in which the same day, the same
sequence of events, keeps happening over and over again. I’m talking about the
pattern of scaring progressive Americans more than half to death in service to
a president driven to bogus certainties by his own ego, ignorance and
incuriousness.
We’re now a few weeks into
the Trump administration—two words that continue to be, and I’m pretty sure
always will be, very hard for me to write—and it’s utterly clear that anyone
who thought that Petty, Boorish Campaign Trump would yield to some semblance of
Statesmanlike President Trump was dead wrong.
Evidence of this is so
abundant that it’s hard to choose among the seemingly endless cases in point.
Who and what hasn’t the man insulted,
belittled, and attempted to silence or marginalize? Examples range from our
free and objective press to the tenuous existence of the Senate filibuster as a
safeguard against ideological extremists on the Supreme Court. But here’s a
for-instance from this morning’s newspaper—word that our Diplomat in Chief hung
up on Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull after harshly criticizing an
Obama-brokered refugee-acceptance deal between the two nations and informing
Turnbull that, of Trump’s five telephone conversations with world leaders that
day, “this call was by far the worst.”
This, in a nutshell, is what
we’re dealing with: A deeply disturbed—I believe mentally ill, far beyond the
obvious narcissistic personality disorder—chief executive who’s incapable of an
iota of civility in the face of anything he doesn’t like, and whose
off-the-charts ego brooks no thought that anything isn’t ultimately All About
Him. I mean, how childish is comparing phone calls? (“Why can’t you kiss my ass
like Putin does?”) Did I mention the fact that the reason Trump so loathes
Obama’s agreement to take in 1,250 refugees from an Australian detention center
is that “I’m going to get killed politically for this”?)
Also, the Washington Post reports, BLOATUS (tip of
the hat to humor columnist Gene Weingarten, who was referencing Trump’s girth
but might just as easily have been invoking the apt noun “bloviator”) managed
to insert into the 25-minute conversation with Turnbull (it was supposed to
have been an hour) yet another boast about the “magnitude” of his Electoral
College win—which actually was small by historical standards. (And never mind
the popular vote, which Trump delusionally refuses to acknowledge he fairly and
legitimately lost by almost three million ballots.)
Anyway, back to Groundhog
Day. I was among the roughly half-million people who, on January 21, the day
after Trump’s inauguration, thronged Washington’s National Mall to signal our
fury at the new president’s rhetoric, personal assaults on, and promised
actions toward women. We were joined that day by perhaps 1.5 million more protesters across the US and around the world.
Friends of mine turned out in towns as small as Sonoma, California, and cities
as large as New York and Philadelphia.
It was energizing and
encouraging—if hugely claustrophobic and sometimes chaotic—to be in the midst
of so many like-minded Americans, who importantly—in their signage and their
chants—emphasized not only that women’s rights are human rights, but that
matters such as the health of the environment and our education and health care
systems are universal concerns, as well.
Yes, it remains to be seen
how effectively all of this outrage can be channeled in ways that truly impact
decision-making and policies, given the Republican stranglehold on Washington.
We marchers and other progressives must do much more than preach to the choir.
We need to let lawmakers know where we stand, donate and/or volunteer our time
to causes in which we believe, and, perhaps most importantly, try in whatever
small ways we can to engage with those with whom we disagree—trying less overtly
to convert them than to help them understand why we fear America is selling its
soul to broad and outlandish promises of backward time travel to an era when
coal was king and the world was far less dangerous.
I guess I didn’t actually get
back to Groundhog Day, as I promised a few paragraphs ago. But that sentence
above about coal and danger hints as where I’m going with this. Please stay
with me.
I mentioned the signage at
the Women’s March on DC. It was inventive and wonderful. It tended to get to
the heart of things in a modicum of words. Much of it centered on reproductive
rights, sexual assault (per Trump’s brags in the infamous Access Hollywood video) and misogyny (Hillary Clinton as a “nasty
woman”). Inevitably, though, the writings also focused specifically on the
polarizing man who prompted the marches. Signs and posters read “Toddler in
Chief.” “Apologize.” “We Shall Overcomb.”
Perhaps my favorite sign that
day was the profane but all-encompassing “Fuck This Shit.” But that’s also where
Groundhog Day comes in, because inherent in that three-word epithet was a
sentiment that was expressed in a number of other signs and posters that were
worded slightly differently but all conveyed the sense of frustration and exhaustion
that was captured in one that read “I Can’t Believe I’m Still Having to Do
This.”
Take reproductive rights:
Wasn’t that settled by Roe v Wade in 1973?
Take sexual assault: Didn’t
we as a nation decide long ago that it’s an awful and intolerable thing?
Take misogyny: Hasn’t our
national progress against this hideous mindset been slowly but steadily improving over the
years, as more and more glass ceilings have been broken?
Take the environment: Wasn’t
the first Earth Day held in 1970, and wasn’t it Richard Nixon, of all people,
who signed legislation establishing the Environmental Protection Agency that
same year?
Take health care: Isn't there
agreement now that all Americans deserve an affordable option, even if there’s
vast disagreement about how to achieve that goal?
Take education: Hasn’t
improving public schools always been our national aim?
But then, look at today’s
Trumpian realities:
Zeal to overturn the Roe
decision, as reflected in the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to claim the Supreme
Court seat that was outright stolen from Obama nominee Merrick Garland.
Election of a president who’s
on record bragging about sexually assaulting women.
A national misogyny so
pervasive that not only could Trump get elected despite his treatment of women,
but that Hillary Clinton was constantly attacked on the campaign trail by Trump
supporters in the most hateful of terms, as he encouraged cheers of “Lock Her
Up.”
Utter disregard for the
environment, reflected in Trump’s dismissal of climate change as a “hoax” and his appointment of an avowed EPA enemy to lead the department.
The gleeful dismantling of
the Affordable Care Act, to ultimately be replaced by a system that seems
certain to start with devastatingly high deductibles.
The nomination as Education
Secretary of a woman who has thrown her considerable wealth behind decimating
public education and funneling public dollars to for-profit vendors and
religiously affiliated schools.
It’s instructive to note that
Gorsuch supporters laud him as an constitutional “originalist” in the mode of
the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Webster’s Dictionary defines “originalism” as
“the belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the
way the authors originally intended it.” The Constitution was signed in 1787.
Now, I’m not saying the Founding Fathers weren’t in many ways wise and even
revolutionary men. We owe them a great debt of gratitude. We do not, however,
owe them fealty to a literal, stuck-in-time interpretation of a document that now
is 230 years old and was written at a time of horse travel, outhouses and the 13 original colonies.
This, to me, is the ultimate
in Groundhog Day. Hey! Let’s live by the values and precepts of 1787 to
determine the laws of 2017!
Let’s work under the
assumption that nothing has changed, and that the complexities of modern life
never happened! It’s the same principle, after all, that’s governed the
one-sided gun control “debate” that the National Rifle Association won long
ago. The Second Amendment to the Constitution, passed in 1789, reads, “A
well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”
Never mind the explicit reference to “militia” in those
dangerous times, when much of America was drunk and rowdy, and Native Americans
were inexplicably hostile toward the White Man’s confiscation of their lands. Disregard the
fact that the US has by far the highest murder and violence rates in the
Western world, thanks to the flood of firearms and our toothless checks on easy
access to them.
It’s all Groundhog Day. Nothing seems to really change. Or,
if something does, in an evolutionary way, it’s subject to reversal.
So it is that reproductive choice now is seriously threatened.
Sexual assault is dismissed as “locker room talk.” What would have been the
first female president became yet another white male—and a particularly nasty
one, at that. Big business and Wall Street get every break from this
administration, while the planet gets none. The high ideals of “Obamacare” are thrown
on history’s scrap heap. Public education seeks an advocate in vain.
There was another profane but spot-on sign at the DC march
that I particularly liked. It read, “Dear Congress: Stop Being Assholes.
Signed, the United States of America.” Sadly, though there’s no hint that the Republican-led
Congress has any interest in discontinuing or even leavening its assholic-ness.
What’s even worse to me, though, is the reason for their intemperance: They
have the backing of their constituents.
What the presidential election of 2016 told me was that a majority of Americans (with caveats—voting
Americans, Electoral College-vote
Americans) don’t, on balance, care about anything nearly as much as they do promises
that jobs lost to globalization and mechanization will magically reappear, and pledges
that domestic terrorism will cease if this country will reject its history of
welcoming immigrants. Just look at the poll numbers: While people like me are
decrying Trump’s assaults on our civil liberties, the majority of Americans,
the numbers say, are being persuaded—by his tweeted threats to individual companies
and his sweeping executive orders on immigration—that he’s Creating Jobs and
Keeping America Safe.
Other
signs I spotted at the Women’s March on DC insisted that “This”—meaning the
Trump administration’s priorities—“Is Not Who We Are.” But I seriously wonder.
It’s certainly not who many of us are. But are we really in the
majority?
It
may be that social media—that liberating and bullying societal force that
simultaneously puts at our fingertips both facts and those who willfully reject
them—has freed the America that’s been hiding in plain sight all the time. I’m talking
about the embittered America that will support anything and anyone that it
believes will return the nation to an illusionary, halcyon past. Perhaps the
xenophobic, isolationist, racist and sexist America that has startlingly
revealed itself at various times in our history not only never went away, but
simply needed embolding chat rooms and Twitter feeds in order to reach full
flower.
I
very much hope I’m wrong about that. But then again, I’d hoped that my worst
fears about Trump would prove to be overstated. Instead, as I look to tomorrow,
the day after Groundhog Day, I see only a repetition of today.
No comments:
Post a Comment